Search results

From Max-EuP 2012
Results 1 – 12 of 12
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

  • Non-Pecuniary Loss
    ...ersonal injuries or violations of values such as human dignity, liberty or privacy should be compensated under the [[Law of Torts/Delict, General and Lex Aqui ...his judgment of the ECtHR led to a recalibration of the test for balancing privacy and freedom of expression under German law, with the result that the protec
    20 KB (3,069 words) - 17:15, 14 September 2021
  • Council of Europe (Harmonization of Private Law)
    ...court quoted Parliamentary Assembly Resolution 1165 (1998) on the right to privacy; in the ''Wagner v Luxemburg'' judgment (ECtHR No 76240/01 § 42, on a
    12 KB (1,865 words) - 14:14, 10 August 2021
  • Personality Rights
    ...le. Fourth, personality rights, particularly as far as data protection and privacy are concerned, are currently under additional pressure because of digitaliz ... v Hello! Ltd'' [2003] 3 All ER 996). But a comprehensive law of privacy, as is recognized in US law, is still alien to English law.
    21 KB (3,221 words) - 12:14, 15 September 2021
  • Punitive Damages
    ...ontext of media torts, when assessing damages for a breach of the right to privacy ([[Personality Rights|personality rights]]), the courts acknowledge that de ...libérée'','' et notamment d’une faute lucrative''). Aside from breaches of privacy rights through the media, aspects of prevention and retribution are conside
    15 KB (2,250 words) - 10:35, 16 September 2021
  • Marriage
    ...European Union]], mirroring the present standard of human rights, protects privacy and the freedom to marry (Arts 7, 9). Thereby, personal relations are ...ishing. Most such rules aim at protecting the weaker spouse (protection of privacy; protection against violence; review of unconscionable contracts). European
    20 KB (3,033 words) - 14:36, 14 September 2021
  • Evidence (International)
    ...to present evidence to support one’s case clashes with another’s right to privacy or confidentiality. ...be looked upon as a (further) violation of the affected person’s right to privacy or confidentiality. Only in exceptional cases, where the legitimate interes
    21 KB (3,291 words) - 13:41, 14 September 2021
  • Damages
    ...bility for the violation of strictly personal rights, such as the right to privacy ([[Non-Pecuniary Loss|non-pecuniary loss]]), but it is not restricted to th ...case concerning damages claims for intentional violations of the right to privacy or other personal rights by the media. When assessing damages, the German F
    22 KB (3,492 words) - 15:21, 14 October 2021
  • E-Commerce
    ..., intellectual property rights, law of telecommunication, tax law and data privacy. These legal provisions respond to the diversity of new distribution method ...and distance contracts, can be found in Art 13 of Dir 2002/58 on privacy and electronic communications. It states that the use of e-mail, fax and au
    22 KB (3,202 words) - 13:00, 14 September 2021
  • Greek Civil Code
    ...tor. The right of personality also covers the right to protection of one’s privacy, including protection against surveillance measures and unauthorized photog
    12 KB (1,740 words) - 13:12, 19 August 2021
  • Legal Culture
    ...r the weaker party in contract law, stronger emphasis on human dignity and privacy, etc.
    21 KB (3,188 words) - 16:47, 2 September 2021
  • Non-Contractual Obligations (PIL)
    ...law applicable to non-contractual obligations arising out of violations to privacy and rights relating to personality (JLS/2007/C4/028).
    22 KB (3,448 words) - 17:09, 14 September 2021
  • Legal Scholarship
    ...icularly in the areas of family law, civil procedure and the protection of privacy.
    25 KB (3,782 words) - 13:45, 6 September 2021

Retrieved from Special:Search – Max-EuP 2012 on 28 April 2024.

Terms of Use

The Max Planck Encyclopedia of European Private Law, published as a print work in 2012, has been made freely available in 2021 as an online edition at <max-eup2012.mpipriv.de>.

The materials published here are subject to exclusive rights of use as held by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law and the publisher Oxford University Press; they may only be used for non-commercial purposes. Users may download, print, and make copies of the text files being made freely available to the public. Further, users may translate excerpts of the entries and cite them in the context of academic work, provided that the following requirements are met:

  • Use for non-commercial purposes
  • The textual integrity of each entry and its elements is maintained
  • Citation of the online reference according to academic standards, indicating the author, keyword title, work name, and date of retrieval (see Suggested Citation Style).